SourceForge.net
2004-07-03 04:24:29 UTC
Feature Requests item #960681, was opened at 2004-05-26 19:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tanderson
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=960681&group_id=54559
Category: enhancement
Group: None
Submitted By: Edward Chu (edward_chee)
Initial Comment:
Hi there
Just wondering if anyone has given thought to using
prevayler as the persistence layer.
Prevayler serializes writes to a log file on disk. It also
caches java objects in memory.
For JMS apps focussed on high throughput, I'm thinking
that prevayler might be able to give a large performance
boost.
For example, it claims 3000x performance boost
compared to MySQL for queries. See
http://www.prevayler.org/wiki.jsp
Thanks
edward
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=557161
No. We're moving towards supporting only JDBC based
persistent solutions. Prevayler also seems to require all
persistent objects to be able to reside in memory - not
applicable to applications such as OpenJMS where the no. of
persistent objects is dynamic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=960681&group_id=54559
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tanderson
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=960681&group_id=54559
Category: enhancement
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5Submitted By: Edward Chu (edward_chee)
Assigned to: Tim Anderson (tanderson)
Summary: high throughput using prevayler persistence?Initial Comment:
Hi there
Just wondering if anyone has given thought to using
prevayler as the persistence layer.
Prevayler serializes writes to a log file on disk. It also
caches java objects in memory.
For JMS apps focussed on high throughput, I'm thinking
that prevayler might be able to give a large performance
boost.
For example, it claims 3000x performance boost
compared to MySQL for queries. See
http://www.prevayler.org/wiki.jsp
Thanks
edward
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tim Anderson (tanderson)
Date: 2004-07-03 14:24Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=557161
No. We're moving towards supporting only JDBC based
persistent solutions. Prevayler also seems to require all
persistent objects to be able to reside in memory - not
applicable to applications such as OpenJMS where the no. of
persistent objects is dynamic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=960681&group_id=54559