Discussion:
[openjms-developer] [ openjms-Feature Requests-1823333 ] need configurable initial callback delay
SourceForge.net
2007-10-31 08:15:50 UTC
Permalink
Feature Requests item #1823333, was opened at 2007-10-31 08:15
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=1823333&group_id=54559

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: enhancement
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: martin kraegeloh (mkraegeloh)
Assigned to: Jim Alateras (jalateras)
Summary: need configurable initial callback delay

Initial Comment:
since I ran into a situation where the subscribe code has not yet finished when the first callback is started the qhole queueing deadlocks.

I could solve this by configuring openjms to wait a few seconds before notifying the client for the first time.

patch contains the code to add e.g., -DinvocationDelay=10000 to the java start command.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=1823333&group_id=54559
SourceForge.net
2007-11-01 03:32:04 UTC
Permalink
Feature Requests item #1823333, was opened at 2007-10-31 19:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tanderson
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=1823333&group_id=54559

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: enhancement
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: martin kraegeloh (mkraegeloh)
Assigned to: Jim Alateras (jalateras)
Summary: need configurable initial callback delay

Initial Comment:
since I ran into a situation where the subscribe code has not yet finished when the first callback is started the qhole queueing deadlocks.

I could solve this by configuring openjms to wait a few seconds before notifying the client for the first time.

patch contains the code to add e.g., -DinvocationDelay=10000 to the java start command.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tim Anderson (tanderson)
Date: 2007-11-01 14:32

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=557161
Originator: NO

The patch file doesn't contain any context, so its not clear what you are
trying to achieve.
See http://openjms.sourceforge.net/devguide/submit.html for instructions
on generating patches.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=1823333&group_id=54559
SourceForge.net
2007-11-01 12:45:49 UTC
Permalink
Feature Requests item #1823333, was opened at 2007-10-31 08:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mkraegeloh
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=1823333&group_id=54559

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: enhancement
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: martin kraegeloh (mkraegeloh)
Assigned to: Jim Alateras (jalateras)
Summary: need configurable initial callback delay

Initial Comment:
since I ran into a situation where the subscribe code has not yet finished when the first callback is started the qhole queueing deadlocks.

I could solve this by configuring openjms to wait a few seconds before notifying the client for the first time.

patch contains the code to add e.g., -DinvocationDelay=10000 to the java start command.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: martin kraegeloh (mkraegeloh)
Date: 2007-11-01 12:45

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=552938
Originator: YES

hi, you are right - sorry for that.

cvs diff output now properly attached!

martin
File Added: diff.txt

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Anderson (tanderson)
Date: 2007-11-01 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=557161
Originator: NO

The patch file doesn't contain any context, so its not clear what you are
trying to achieve.
See http://openjms.sourceforge.net/devguide/submit.html for instructions
on generating patches.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=474139&aid=1823333&group_id=54559
Loading...